Legal Opinion

Collier v. Brown

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 4, 1932No. 3650PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaliaferro, J.

Plaintiff instituted this suit again-st defendants to recover a balance due him on open account. He alleges that the account arose in 1929, while defendants were engaged in the operation of a small sawmill, and while not aware of the nature of the agreement between the defendants with regard to the said sawmill, the goods, gas, oil, etc., charged on the account sued on, were sold at the solicitation of each of the defendants, and the account has been acknowledged by them and a payment thereon made by defendant Brown.

Defendant Willard did not answer suit. Brown did. He denies any liability to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Watson Bros. v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  2. Clark v. Jones & BrotherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  3. Wallenburg v. KerryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Shepherd v. Butcher Tool & Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Day v. AdcockAlabama Court of Appeals · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fuselier v. HudsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. Hornsby v. RivesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Seashell, Inc. v. SimonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. Continental Casualty Co. v. Associated Pipe & Supply Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1967
  5. Custom Contract Co. v. NimsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API