Legal Opinion

Shepherd v. Clements

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1931No. 6 Div. 788PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This was an action on the common counts by O. R. Clements against Shepherd Sloss Realty Company, the individuals composing that firm, and R. G. Hawkins, for work and labor done. The defendant Hawkins was eliminated by amendment because of lack of service.

The trial was before the circuit court without a jury, and, at the conclusion of the testimony, heard ore tenus, the learned trial judge rendered judgment for the plaintiff, Clements (appellee here), for $381.37. The defendants (appellants) bring the cause here for review by appeal.

No exception was reserved to the rendition of the judgment…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Marston v. . SwettNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Ex parte DoakSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. Boykin v. Dohlonde & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1861
  4. Shepherd v. ClementsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  5. Jones v. HaglerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shepherd v. ClementsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  2. Erving Paper Mills v. Hudson-Sharp Machine Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1963
  3. Shepherd v. ClementsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API