Legal Opinion

Fairley v. Falcon

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 1, 1927PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Graff, J.

Plaintiff-payee, J. S.: Fairley, seeks to re cover judgment on two promissory notes. The admitted signatures of the defendants W. C. and C. Falcon, son and father, are appended, as makers, to said notes.

The petition is in two counts. The note in Count 1 is for $2,500, dated September 13, 1918, and due on or before six months after said date. The note in Count 2 is for $2,000, dated May 2, 1922, and payable six months after said date.

The defendant W. C. Falcon defaulted, but the defendant C. Falcon filed his verified answer, in which he denied that he signed the said notes at the time of their…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dale v. GearSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
  2. Crawford v. NolanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  3. Nickell v. BradshawOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Seymour v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  5. Stearns v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Miles v. RoseSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  2. Lenth v. SchugSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  3. Groves v. City of Webster CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  4. Lawyer v. StansellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  5. Millard v. CurtisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API