Legal Opinion
Millard v. Curtis
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided February 12, 1929No. 39198PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.
The note sued on is in common form, payable to the order of Dunlap State Bank, signed by defendant, as sole maker. The answer is in two divisions: one a general denial, and the other by separate division:
“This defendant, Gertrude M. Curtis, alleges that her husband, who was an officer in the said bank on or- about the date of the note set out in Count II of said petition, presented the said note to her and asked her to sign it; that she never did receive anything of value from said bank, and never agreed to sign said note as surety or otherwise for her said husband; that she had no…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ormsby v. GrahamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Heiman v. FelderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Sutherland v. Standard Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- Hinman v. TreinenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- First National Bank of Grand Haven v. ZeimsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Leonard v. WoodwardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- First-Trust Joint Stock Land Bank of Chicago v. MeredithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Cooley v. WillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
- First National Bank v. MetherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- Jones v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.