Legal Opinion

Crawford v. Nolan

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 28, 1886PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from Palo Alto Girouit Court. AotioN at law. Trial by jury. Judgment for tbe plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtServers, J.

Soper, Crawford & Carr is a partnership engaged in tbe practice of law, and tbe plaintiff is a member of that firm, who received for collection, through attorneys in Milwaukee and Chicago, certain claims against L. J. Baldwin in favor of D. B. Fiske & Co. and the Cream City Cloak Company. To secure said claims Baldwin executed'to the plaintiff, as trustee, a chattel mortgage on a stock of merchandise. Baldwin was indebted to Lederer, Strauss & Co., who, after the execution of the mortgage, attached the merchandise, and this action is brought against the sheriff and Lederer, Strauss & Co. to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Citizens' Bank v. Dows & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  2. Antrobus v. ShermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  3. Streeter v. HenleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1849

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Shaw v. BorchersTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  2. Jackson v. Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1907
  3. Richards v. Schreiber, Conchar & Westphal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  4. Snouffer & Ford v. City of TiptonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  5. Hatheway v. HansonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API