Bertie's Apple Valley Farms, an Idaho Corporation v. United States of America
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs sued in state court to quiet title to real and personal property. The government successfully petitioned under 28 U.S.C. § 1444 to remove to the district court where the action was dismissed.
The district court dismissed this action as one against the United States to which it had not consented. The United States is immune from suit except where it consents. United States v. Sherwood, 312 U.S. 584, 61 S.Ct. 767, 85 L.Ed. 1058 (1941). Plaintiff contends that Congress has given its consent to suit in this case in 28 U.S.C. § 2410, which provides in relevant part:
“ . . . the United…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Wells v. LongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- Wells v. LongDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1946
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hughes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Dunn & Black, P.S. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Bank of Hemet v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Koehler v. USACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- David M. Cummings v. United States of America and Colonel James M. SiglerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.