Legal Opinion

Dunn & Black, P.S. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 11, 2007No. 05-35766PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:

We must decide whether a law firm can bring an action against the United States to recover attorney’s fees from monies that its client was awarded as a result of a settlement with the Federal Highway Administration, but never received because the Internal Revenue Service requested that payment be withheld to offset unpaid tax liabilities.

I

The United States, through the Western Federal Lands Highway Division of the Federal Highway Administration (“FHWA”), contracted with Environmental Reclamation, Inc. (“ERI”) to work on the Warren Profile Gap Road Project…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. United States v. DalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Citizens Bank of Md. v. StrumpfSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Department of the Army v. Blue Fox, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. United States v. Park Place Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Wagstaff v. United States Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  3. McGuire v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Jeffrey Plaskett v. Christine WormuthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  5. Committee for Immigrant Rights v. County of SonomaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API