Legal Opinion
United States v. Arthur Maurello
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 22, 1996No. 95-5109PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SAROKIN, Circuit Judge:
Defendant, a disbarred lawyer, was convicted of mail fraud by virtue of his unauthorized practice of law. The gross amount of fees he received from his clients was used to calculate the loss caused by his fraud, and in turn, the sentence to be imposed under the guidelines. With some reluctance because of the conduct involved, we conclude and agree with defendant’s contention that fees paid by those who received satisfactory services are not to be included in determining the measurement of loss from his fraudulent scheme. In addition, we remand to the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. Larry KoppCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Marlene Cox Schneider and Paul S. SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Ernest J. Badaracco, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Jack W. BierleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Carlyle Eustace Wong, A/K/A Carlyle WongCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- United States v. Robert E. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- United States of America, Cross-Appellee v. John CanovaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Curtis EvansCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- United States v. William F. HelblingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Frank AnticoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.