Legal Opinion

United States v. Frank Antico

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 28, 2001No. 00-1446PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

AMBRO, Circuit Judge.

Frank Antico, Sr. (“Antico”) appeals his conviction and sentence in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (“District Court”) on one count of racketeering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) — part of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 1 nine substantive counts of extortion in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (known as the Hobbs Act), and eight substantive counts of wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343.

On appeal, Antico asserts that he is entitled to a new trial for three reasons: (1)…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. United States v. KempCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. UrbanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. John A. Gambone, Sr. A/K/A Jack John A. Gambone, Sr., United States of America v. Anthony Gambone A/K/A Tony Anthony GamboneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. Nicholas Panarella, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. Charles W. Walker, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API