Legal Opinion
United States v. Rahman Fulton
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 19, 2016No. 15-1513PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
MCKEE, Chief Judge.
Rahman Fulton appeals his convictions for bank robbery and related offenses. He argues that the prosecution presented improper lay and expert witness testimony as well as misrepresented a key expert’s testimony during its closing argument. Although we agree with Fulton that .the district court improperly admitted certain testimony as lay witness testimony, we conclude that the error was harmless. We also conclude that the prosecution neither *285presented improper expert testimony nor misrepresented the testimony of its expert during its closing.…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- GN Netcom, Inc. v. Plantronics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Anthony RoweCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Bernard GreenspanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Dominique JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Richard Hodge, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.