Legal Opinion

Puckett v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 25, 2009No. 07-9712PublishedCited by 2,976 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia

The question presented by this case is whether a forfeited claim that the Government has violated the terms of a plea agreement is subject to the plain-error standard of review set forth in Rule 52(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

I

In July 2002, James Puckett was indicted by a grand jury in the Northern District of Texas on one count of armed bank robbery, 18 U. S. C. § 2113(a), (d), and one count of using a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence, § 924(c)(1). He negotiated a plea agreement with the Government, which was filed with the District Court on September…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2,976 opinions

  1. Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Molina-Martinez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. United States v. MarcusSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Rosales-Mireles v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  5. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012

2,971 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API