Legal Opinion
In Re Viehe
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 22, 2000No. 99-BG-964PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Per curiam
The Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”) recommends the disbarment of respondent, Karl W. Viehe, for serious violations of the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct in the course of representing two clients in a real estate transaction. In particular, the Board found that respondent intentionally misappropriated client funds accompanied by deliberate dishonest acts and misrepresentations in violation of Rules 1.15(a) and 8.4(c), 1 and violated Rule 1.8(a) by entering into a business transaction with the clients without making the necessary disclosures or obtaining…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re PiersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re StillerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
3Cited by74 opinions
- In Re FairDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- In Re AustinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- In Re DevaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Raleigh Bynum, IIDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- In re Leslie Arnold ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.