Legal Opinion
MacK v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 22, 1994No. 93-AA-1439PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
Petitioner, William A. Mack, seeks review of a decision of the Department of Employment Services (“DOES”) Office of Appeals and Review (“OAR”), that disqualified him, on the basis of job-related misconduct, from receiving unemployment benefits. D.C.Code § 46-lll(b) (1990 Repl. and 1994 Supp.). Because the record does not contain the findings necessary to support a discharge for misconduct, we must vacate and remand for further proceedings.
I
In early April 1992, petitioner resigned in lieu of termination from his job as a Corrections Officer at the Department of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Perkins v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Jadallah v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Dietrich v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
- Washington Post Co. v. District Unemployment Compensation BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Hickenbottom v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rodriguez v. Filene's Basement Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- King v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- District of Columbia v. Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Williams v. District of Columbia Department of Public WorksDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Jacqueline Lynch v. Masters SecurityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.