Legal Opinion
Therrien v. Safeguard Manufacturing Co.
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided June 18, 1979No. File 24700PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMissal, J.
The third party defendant has moved to strike the complaint of the third party plaintiff, the named defendant.
After sustaining severe personal injuries, the plaintiff brought this action against the named defendant, the manufacturer of a safety device, which, if it had functioned properly, would have prevented the injury. The named defendant, hereinafter the third party plaintiff, has made a motion to implead the plaintiff’s employer, the Torin Corporation, hereinafter the third party defendant. The third party complaint alleges both that the third party defendant, when it bought the safety…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dole v. Dow Chemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Preferred Accident Insurance v. Musante, Berman & Steinberg Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Gomeau v. ForrestSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- McClish v. Niagara MacHine & Tool WorksDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1967
- Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Kohn Bros. Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Johnson v. Interstate Power Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1992
- Myco, Inc. v. Super Concrete Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Gregory v. Garrett Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- SW (Delaware), Inc. v. American Consumers Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
- In Re General Dynamics Asbestos CasesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.