Legal Opinion
In Re General Dynamics Asbestos Cases
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 21, 1982No. CML 1PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT GENERAL DYNAMIC’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BLUMENFELD, Senior District Judge.
A number of individual suits have been filed in this court by plaintiffs who allege that they or the individuals whom they represent have suffered injuries as a result of exposure to asbestos products during the course of their employment at the Electric Boat Division of the General Dynamics Corporation (Electric Boat). Many of these individual actions have been consolidated for certain purposes under the caption, C.M.L. 1. Nine of the primary defendants in these cases,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Slattery v. Marra Bros., Inc. Marra Bros., Inc. v. Wm. Spencer & Son CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Paula H. Roy v. Star Chopper Company, Inc., and Third-Party v. Ashok Hingorany and Advanced Materials Systems, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Celia Zapico v. Bucyrus-Erie Co., and Third-Party v. Atlantic Container Line, Ltd., Third-Party and Antonio Fuet, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- White v. Johns-Manville Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Therrien v. Safeguard Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Decker v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Johns-Manville Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
- In Re All Maine Asbestos LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1984
- Lopez v. Johns ManvilleDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1986
- Rafael Triguero v. Consolidated Rail Corporation, Consolidated Rail Corporation, Third-Party v. Universal Maritime Service Corporation, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.