Clarke v. Mead
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Action to quiet title. The plaintiff was the owner of a certain tract of land in San Francisco, situate in the district which was assessed for the widening of Mission street, continued from Twenty-sixth street to the county line. The assessment being delinquent, the superintendent of streets sold the lot to the defendant, November 29, 1889, and no redemption having been made, that officer, on the 29th of December, 1890, executed a conveyance of the land to the defendant. At the trial the plaintiff gave evidence tending to show title in himself at the date of the sale, and the defendant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Marx v. HanthornSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- McDonald v. ConniffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Rollins v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re PorterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Crocker v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Tilton v. RussekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Hall v. CappsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- González Levy v. Corte de Distrito de San JuanSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.