Legal Opinion
Waterbury Buckle Co. v. G. E. Prentice Mfg. Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided December 18, 1923No. 1598PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, District Judge.
This is a suit brought to restrain the infringement of letters patent No. 847,811, issued March 19, 1907, to the plaintiff on the application of Morris Peller for an improvement in suspender buckles. On June 14, 1904, there was also issued to Dwight R. Smith patent No. 762,662, which was duly assigned to the plaintiff. This was also for a suspender buckle and expired June 14, 1921.
The plaintiff is engaged in the manufacture of buckles in Waterbury and the defendant is engaged, at Berlin, Conn., in the manufacture of small hardware, buckles, sheet metal, and wire goods.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Grant v. RaymondSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- The UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUND. v. Block Drug Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1955
- Jacquard Knitting MacHine Co. v. Ordnance Gauge Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
- In re HowardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- Federal Telephone & Radio Corp. v. Associated Tel. & Tel. Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1951
- O'Connell v. Gentry County BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.