Legal Opinion
Federal Telephone & Radio Corp. v. Associated Tel. & Tel. Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided June 26, 1951No. Civ. No. 872PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RODNEY, District Judge.
The complaint in this action, seeking a declaratory judgment, was filed on May 2, 1946, charging that Automatic, by certain advertisements,, had threatened prospective purchasers of Federal’s automatic telephone equipment with patent infringement *537suits.1 The Court of Appeals for this Circuit has held that a justiciable controversy was thus presented.2 Subsequently leave was granted to Federal to file a sup-plemental complaint, covering automatic equipment not put in issue in the original complaint.3
On January 11, 1950, Automatic filed ■counterclaims asserting numerous…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Marconi Wireless Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Ensten v. Simon, Ascher & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Yale Lock Manufacturing Co. v. SargentSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- McCreary v. Pennsylvania Canal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- The UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUND. v. Block Drug Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1955
- EJ Brooks Co. v. Stoffel Seals CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Bowser, Inc. v. Richmond Engineering Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1958