Griffin v. Housing Authority of the City of Durham
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Chief Judge.
The sole question is, assuming plaintiffs evidence is true, whether defendant was entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. The purpose of summary judgment is to bring litigation to an early decision on the merits without the delay and expense of trial when no material facts are at issue. McNair v. Boyette, 282 N.C. 230, 192 S.E. 2d 457 (1972). Since the evidence was uncontradicted, there is no issue of material fact. The only question is whether defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
Plaintiffs argument is, in essence, that even though he was an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Presnell v. PellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Still v. LanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- McNair v. BoyetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Humphrey v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. KeenanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Walker v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Harris v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Ferraro v. KoelschCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
- Rupinsky v. Miller Brewing Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.