Legal Opinion
In Re Farmers Insurance Exchange Claims Representatives' Overtime Pay Litigation
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided November 6, 2003No. MDL 33-1439PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
ROBERT E. JONES, District Judge.
In this multidistrict litigation (“MDL”), the named plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated current and former personal lines claims representatives (“CR”) employed by defendant Farmers Insurance Exchange (“FIE”), bring a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq, and class actions under seven states’ laws, alleging that they are owed overtime pay. 1 Specifically, plaintiffs allege that they are entitled to recover overtime wages and liquidated…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Robinson-Smith v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- In re Live Concert Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
- Robinson-Smith v. Government Employees InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Chase v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeColorado Court of Appeals · 2004