Legal Opinion

Chase v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided October 7, 2004No. 03CA1301PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKapelke, J.

In this class action for recovery of overtime compensation, plaintiffs, Paula Chase, Larry Guerra, Walter Johnson, and Michael Alexander, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated individuals, appeal the summary judgment in favor of defendant, Farmers Insurance Exchange (FIE). We reverse and remand.

In their complaint, filed in August 2001, plaintiffs alleged that they and the other members of the putative class were nonexempt employees of FIE and thus entitled to overtime pay under the Colorado Wage Order No. 22 (the Wage Order). The Wage Order regulates the “wages, hours,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Bell v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Feiger, Collison & Killmer v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  4. McIntyre v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  5. Dalal v. Alliant Techsystems, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jordan v. Maxim Healthcare ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  2. Brunson v. Colorado Cab Company, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Kennett v. Bayada Home Health Care, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2015
  4. Hinely v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 2016
  5. Combs v. Jaguar Energy Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API