Legal Opinion
Winik-Nystrup v. Manufacturers Life Insurance
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 31, 1998No. CIV. 3:94CV0947 JBAPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC. # 37]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Debra Lee Winik-Nystrup raises several claims arising out of her discharge from her position with defendant Manufacturers Life Insurance Company (“Manulife”). Plaintiff alleges that the discharge violated Connecticut, General Statute Section 31-51q and public policy. (Compl. at 5-7). In addition, plaintiff alleges that Manulife breached its implied employment contract and the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. (Compl. at 7-9).
Defendant Manulife has moved for partial summary…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rode v. DellarcipreteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Dallas v. StanglinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gary D. Swank v. James SmartCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Barlow v. ConnecticutDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
- Lopez v. Burris Logistics Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- McClain v. PFIZER, INC.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- Campbell v. Windham Community Memorial Hospital, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Downing v. West Haven Board of Ed.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.