Legal Opinion
Barlow v. Connecticut
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 5, 2004No. 3:00-cv-01983PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTIONS TO STRIKE
ELLEN B. BURNS, Senior District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Aurice Barlow, (“Barlow” or “plaintiff’) brings 'this employment discrimination action against the State of Connecticut, Department of Public Health and Elizabeth Weinstein, an employee of the Department of Public Health, (“Defendants” or “DPH” or “Weinstein”) pursuant to Title VTI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and Conn. Gen.Stat. § 31-51q. Defendants now move pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. .56 for summary judgment on all claims [Dkt.…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wahhab v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Douglas v. City of WaterburyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- Desmond v. Yale-New Haven Hospital, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- Ludwiczak v. Hitachi Capital America Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- Congdon v. Educational Credit Management Corp. (In Re Congdon)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.