Legal Opinion
United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 18, 1990No. 88 CIV. 4486 (DNE)PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
This opinion emanates from the voluntary settlement in the action commenced by plaintiff United States of America (the “Government”) against defendants International Brotherhood of Teamsters (the “IBT”) and the IBT’s General Executive Board (the “GEB”) embodied in the voluntary consent order entered March 14, 1989 (the “Consent Decree”). The remedial provisions in the Consent Decree provided for three Court-appointed officials, the Independent Administrator to oversee the remedial provisions, the Investigations Officer to bring charges against…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Joint Council 73 v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, WarehousemenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.