United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
This opinion emanates from the voluntary settlement in the action commenced by the plaintiffs United States of America (the “Government”) against the defendants International Brotherhood of Teamsters (the “IBT”) and the IBT’s General Executive Board (the “GEB”) embodied in the voluntary consent order entered March 14, 1989 (the “Consent Decree”). The remedial provisions in the Consent Decree provided for three Court-appointed officials, the Independent Administrator to oversee the remedial provisions, an Investigations Officer to bring charges…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.