Legal Opinion

United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 13, 1991No. 88 CIV. 4486 (DNE)PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*819MEMORANDUM & ORDER

EDELSTEIN, District Judge:

This decision arises from the implementation of the rules for the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (“IBT”) International Union Delegate and Officer Election promulgated by the Election Officer (the “election rules”) and approved by this Court by Opinion & Order dated July 10, 1990, 742 F.Supp. 94 (S.D.N.Y.1990), and the Court of Appeals United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 931 F.2d 177 (2d Cir.1991). These election rules provide a “framework for the first fully democratic, secret ballot election in the history” of the IBT.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Martin v. WilksSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  3. United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  4. United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  5. United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  2. United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  3. United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  4. United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  5. United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API