Legal Opinion
United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 13, 1990No. 88 CIV. 4486 (DNE)PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
This opinion emanates from the voluntary settlement in the action commenced by the plaintiffs United States of America (the “Government”) against the defendants International Brotherhood of Teamsters (the “IBT”) and the IBT’s General Executive Board (the “GEB”) embodied in the voluntary consent order entered March 14, 1989 (the “Consent Decree”). The remedial provisions in the Consent Decree provided for three Court-appointed officials; the Independent Administrator to oversee the remedial provisions, an Investigations Officer to bring charges against…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, WarehousemenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.