Legal Opinion

Wootan v. Shaw

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 6, 1951No. 34157PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment founded upon a jury verdict awarding punitive damages to the plaintiff, Leslie Shaw, against the defendant, Ralph Wootan, d/b/a Ralph’s Drug Company, because of the gross negligence of an employee of said defendant in unlawfully selling plaintiff several capsules of sodium amytal without requiring the prescription of a doctor. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

The defendant Ralph Wootan was the owner and operator of a drugstore in Oklahoma City, Okla., wherein he had in his employ the defendant Harry S. McMillian, as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pure Oil Co. v. QuarlesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Keener Oil & Gas Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Railway Co. v. LeeTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Yerian v. LinkletterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Kedes v. Christian County Coal Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1909

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BraswellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  2. Graham v. KeuchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  3. Dayton Hudson Corp. v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. Marshall v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  5. Mitchell v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API