Legal Opinion
Hendler v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 9, 1996No. 456-84LPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBINSON, Judge:
This case is before the court after trial, which was held in various locations in southern California in 1995.
Findings of Fact
The plaintiffs own, either individually or as trustees, approximately 97.3 acres of land (“plaintiffs’ property” or “the subject property”) in an unincorporated region of western Riverside County, California, commonly known as the Jurupa district. Specifically, plaintiffs’ property lies on the north and south sides of State Highway 60 (a/k/a the Pomona Freeway), one of the major freeways connecting Los Angeles with its eastern suburbs. The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Henry Hendler, Paul Garrett and Tillie Goldring as Trustees for Henry Hendler and Irving Gronsky v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- CCA Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Kemp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Hendler v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.