Legal Opinion

Kemp v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 15, 2005No. 04-65 LPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HEWITT, Judge.

Before the court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint and Memorandum in Support Thereof (Def.’s Mot.), Plaintiffs Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint (Pl.’s Resp.) and Defendant’s Reply Brief in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Second Amended Complaint (Def.’s Reply). For the following reasons, defendant’s motion is GRANTED.

I. Background

Plaintiff Jane Patience Kemp alleges that the United States effected a temporary taking of her property by a 1980 Act of Congress that…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. Reed Island-MLC, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. Otay Mesa Property L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  4. Howard v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  5. Love Terminal Partners v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API