Legal Opinion

Hendler v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 16, 1997No. 456-84LPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAMAGES OPINION

ROBINSON, Judge.

This Opinion shall be read in conjunction with the court’s Opinion on liability, Hendler v. United States, 36 Fed.Cl. 574 (1996). The damages phase of trial in this takings case was held March 17 and 18,1997 in Pasadena, California. For the reasons set forth below, the court finds that plaintiffs are not entitled to compensation from defendant for the well easements on their property.

Background

This takings case concerns the installation of wells to monitor and determine the extent of groundwater contamination underlying plaintiffs’ property. Following the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Henry Hendler, Paul Garrett and Tillie Goldring as Trustees for Henry Hendler and Irving Gronsky v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  2. Bassett, New Mexico LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  3. Love Terminal Partners v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  4. John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  5. Cebe Farms, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API