Raskin v. Ford Motor Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DEL SOLE, P.J.:
¶ 1 This is an appeal from the judgment entered, following a jury trial, in favor of Appellee Ford Motor Company (“Ford”). Appellant Lee Robin Raskin (“Appellant”) filed this product liability action to recover for injuries she sustained in a motor vehicle accident. Appellant was the driver of a Ford vehicle struck in the rear, as part of a chain collision, while stopped at a red light. Appellant’s suit against Ford is based upon her assertion that the Ford’s seat and/or restraint system was defective, and that its failure at the time of the accident resulted in enhanced…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ratti v. Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Stewart v. MottsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Rogers v. Johnson & Johnson Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Lenkiewicz v. LangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Clark v. Philadelphia College of Osteopathic MedicineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Parr, J. v. Ford Motor CompanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- McManamon v. WashkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Meyer v. Union RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Geise v. Nationwide Life & Annuity Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Atwell v. Beckwith MacHinery Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.