Legal Opinion

Raskin v. Ford Motor Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 19, 2003PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, P.J.:

¶ 1 This is an appeal from the judgment entered, following a jury trial, in favor of Appellee Ford Motor Company (“Ford”). Appellant Lee Robin Raskin (“Appellant”) filed this product liability action to recover for injuries she sustained in a motor vehicle accident. Appellant was the driver of a Ford vehicle struck in the rear, as part of a chain collision, while stopped at a red light. Appellant’s suit against Ford is based upon her assertion that the Ford’s seat and/or restraint system was defective, and that its failure at the time of the accident resulted in enhanced…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ratti v. Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Stewart v. MottsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Rogers v. Johnson & Johnson Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Lenkiewicz v. LangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Clark v. Philadelphia College of Osteopathic MedicineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Parr, J. v. Ford Motor CompanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. McManamon v. WashkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Meyer v. Union RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Geise v. Nationwide Life & Annuity Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Atwell v. Beckwith MacHinery Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API