Legal Opinion

Atwell v. Beckwith MacHinery Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 12, 2005PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMILIA, J.r

¶ 1 Beckwith Machinery Company appeals from the January 29, 2004 judgment of $175,000 entered on the jury’s verdict in favor of Neil Atwell t/d/b/a/ Ben-Hal Mining Company and Janine Atwell (Atwell). Atwell filed a cross-appeal from the January 30,' 2004 counterclaim judgment of $32,484.94 entered on the jury’s verdict in Beckwith’s favor. 1

¶ 2 The underlying cause of action arose out of Atwell’s purchase of a D-11N Caterpillar Tractor from. Beckwith. Atwell maintains that it contracted to purchase for approximately $775,000, a “Caterpillar Certified Rebuild” tractor from…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ferrer v. Trustees of the University of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Neal by Neal v. LuSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. J.W.S. Delavau, Inc. v. Eastern America Transport & Warehousing, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Lenhart v. Cigna CompaniesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Boucher v. Pennsylvania HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ThomasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Vance v. 46 & 2, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Lacava v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Liberatore, L. v. Monongahela Railway CompanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Berger v. SchetmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API