Legal Opinion
Tisher v. California Horse Racing Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 31, 1991No. B053457PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPENCER, P. J.
Introduction
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the trial court denying their petition for writ of mandate, certiorari or prohibition.
Statement of Facts
Plaintiffs 1 hold licenses as harness racing drivers issued by defendant California Horse Racing Board (board). Real party in interest Los Alamitos Racing Association (LARA) owns and operates the Los Alamitos racetrack (Los Alamitos) and is licensed by the board to conduct harness racing meetings there during certain times of the year. In 1989 LARA set standards for harness racing drivers which had the effect of excluding…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Loving & Evans v. BlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Lewin v. St. Joseph Hospital of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Pinsker v. Pacific Coast Society of OrthodontistsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Willis v. Santa Ana Community Hospital Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Paulus v. Bob Lynch Ford, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Locke v. Warner Bros., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Moore v. ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Shaw v. Hughes Aircraft Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Telish v. Cal. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.