Legal Opinion

Lantz v. Coleman

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided May 21, 2008No. File No. No. HHD-CV-08-4034912-SPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, J.

This case presents the question of whether the state may force-feed an inmate engaged in a hunger strike. There appears to be no recorded Connecticut decision on point.1 The plaintiff, Theresa *100C. Lantz, is the current commissioner (commissioner) of the department of correction (department). The defendant, William B. Coleman, is a sentenced prisoner, under the care of the department. He was convicted, after a jury trial, of sexual assault in a spousal relationship and unlawful restraint in the first degree. In May, 2005, he was sentenced to fifteen years imprisonment, execution suspended after…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Waterbury Teachers Ass'n v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hill v. Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Hill v. Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API