Legal Opinion

Zwart v. Penning

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 2018No. 28306PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKern, Justice

[¶1.] Uphill landowners Ryan and Charles Zwart and downhill landowner Timothy Penning agreed to connect their drain-tile systems to allow for improved drainage across their parcels. The Zwarts agreed to build and maintain an independent tile line that would run across Penning's property if the system became overloaded. Penning experienced flooding shortly thereafter, and he believed the *835 connection of the Zwarts' drain tile to his system was the cause. Penning obstructed the connection and later disconnected his drain-tile system from the Zwarts', causing water to pool on the Zwarts'…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Benson v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Brandt v. County of PenningtonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Magner v. BrinkmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Winterton v. ElversonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Fall River County v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Matter of Drainage Permit of McAreaveySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Andersen v. AndersenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Estate of Olsen v. Agtegra Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Estate of Olsen v. Agtegra Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Andersen v. AndersenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API