Legal Opinion

Clarke v. Case

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1906No. Docket No. 95PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Emmet; Shepherd, J. Trespass quare clausum fregit by William J. Clarke against John S. Case. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

This is an action for trespass quare clausum I’-egit, brought by plaintiff in justice’s court in Em me' -unty, and upon plea of title by defendant was cr ’ d under the statute to the circuit court. The ■, es in dispute as claimed by defendant are a £ uncultiv d about 70 feet in width *149extending along the north end and a part of lots 3 and 4, block 3, of “ Whicher’s plat of the village of Little Traverse,” made as early as September, 1851. Plaintiff claims that this strip of land belongs to him and is located on the south part of lot 7 of “ Glenn’s plat of land around Whicher’s plat of Little…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re MathersMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Northrup v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Ott v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Davis v. JermstadMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Dunton v. SweetMichigan Supreme Court · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API