Legal Opinion

City of Philadelphia v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 14, 2007PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SMITH-RIBNER.

The Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County of August 16, 2007 that vacated the decision of SEPTA’s Board of Directors (Board) of June 28, 2007 to eliminate paper transfers as part of its approval of a particular proposal for fare changes and schedule reductions known as “Hybrid Plan A.” The two stated issues include whether the trial court erred by concluding that SEPTA’s Board acted capriciously and therefore manifestly abused its discretion in deciding to implement a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blumenschein v. Pittsburgh Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Summit Towne Centre, Inc. v. Shoe Show of Rocky Mount, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Pap's A.M. v. City of ErieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Pittsburgh Palisades Park, LLC v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Public Defender's Office v. Venango County Court of Common PleasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Finn v. RendellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Harris v. RendellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Consol Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Department of Environmental ProtectionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Commonwealth v. BeckerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. City of Philadelphia v. B. Harvey and D. PenaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API