Davis v. Powell's Valley Water District
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
GUDGEL, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered by the Powell Circuit Court in an action brought as a result of the termination of appellants’ employment. Appellants contend that the trial court erred (1) by finding that the action is barred by limitations, (2) by finding that the action is barred by the doctrine of res judicata, and (8) by finding that appellee Powell’s Valley Water District (Powell’s Valley) is not a “political subdivision” of the commonwealth for purposes of that term as used in the “whistleblower” act, KRS 61.101-61.103. We agree with all of appellants’…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Louis Gorenc v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Dennis v. Fiscal Court of Bullitt CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1990
- Louisville Extension Water Dist. v. Diehl Pump & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952
- Public Service Commission v. Dewitt Water DistrictKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
3Cited by9 opinions
- Experimental Holdings, Inc. v. FarrisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Melvin Kindle v. City of Jeffersontown, KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Northern Kentucky Area Planning Commission v. CloydCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2010
- South Woodford Water District v. ByrdCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2011
- Clemmer v. Rowan Water, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.