Legal Opinion
Louisville Extension Water Dist. v. Diehl Pump & Supply Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided February 22, 1952PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COMBS, Justice.
Diehl Pump and Supply Company recovered judgment in the amount of $607.20 against the Louisville Extension Water District for labor and materials furnished the District. Several grounds are urged for reversal, but we consider it necessary to discuss only one of them.
The District was created under Chapter 74, Kentucky Revised Statutes. KRS 74.020 provides for the appointment of three commissioners who constitute the governing body of the District. KRS 74.070 provides: “ * * * The commission shall be a body corporate for all purposes, * * Such a district, therefore, is a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Princeton v. Princeton Electric Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Floyd County v. Owego Bridge Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
- Jameison v. City of PaducahCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
3Cited by8 opinions
- Transit Authority of Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government v. Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 639 ex rel. DickersonKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
- Northern Kentucky Area Planning Commission v. CloydCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2010
- Snowden v. City of WilmoreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2013
- Davis v. Powell's Valley Water DistrictCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1995
- Simpson County Water District v. City of FranklinKentucky Supreme Court · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.