Legal Opinion
Experimental Holdings, Inc. v. Farris
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 25, 2007No. 06-6394PublishedCited by 504 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Experimental Holdings, Inc. (“EHI”) appeals the district court’s dismissal of its “disappointed bidder” § 1983 claim and its state law claim alleging violations of Kentucky law covering the award of public contracts. Because the procedural requirements of Kentucky lease procurement law do not afford EHI a property interest in getting the state to lease EHI’s real property, the district court properly dismissed EHI’s § 1983 claim. It was also proper for the district court to dismiss EHI’s state law claims, but on grounds different from those given by the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Olim v. WakinekonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by504 opinions
- Regina McCormick v. Miami UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Ziegler v. AukermanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Catanzaro v. HarryDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2012
- Springs v. United States Department of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Maiberger v. City of LivoniaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
499 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.