Legal Opinion
Schemenauer v. TRAVELERS INDEMINITY CO.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided April 11, 1967PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.
Although there are many issues raised, only those which are dispositive of the case and some which may again appear on the retrial will be considered.
Coffey’s Appeal.
Coffey argues for reversal on the ground he was confronted with an emergency as a matter of law and the credible evidence is insufficient to support a finding of causal negligence on his part. These arguments require a review of the evidence which under long-established rules must be viewed in a light most favorable to support the verdict. Rodenkirch v. Johnson (1960), 9 Wis. (2d) 245, 101 N. W. (2d) 83; Ruid v. Davis (1959), 8…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Puhl v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Feldstein v. HarringtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Rodenkirch v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Booth v. FrankensteinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Shaw v. WuttkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. StanislawskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- James E. Kochanski v. Speedway Superamerica, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
- Gustin v. JohannesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Capello v. JaneczkoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- E & K Agency, Inc. v. Van DykeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.