Durham v. City of Spokane
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County. — lion.Leaothcr H. Prather, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered bv
Fullerton, J.
This is an action for personal injuries received by the respondent from a fall upon the sidewalk of the appellant city. The trial resulted in a judgment in favor of the respondents. The first error assigned is upon the refusal of the trial court to sustain a general demurrer to the complaint. That part of the complaint material to the question presented alleged, in substance : That a certain street of the appellant city, known as “Riverside Avenue,” was at the time of the injuries *617complained of, and is now, one of the principal business,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- City of Huntington v. BurkeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
3Cited by23 opinions
- Hanks v. City of Port ArthurTexas Supreme Court · 1932
- Hanks v. City of Port ArthurTexas Supreme Court · 1932
- Medina v. Public Utility Dist. No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- Medina v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- City of Tulsa v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.