Legal Opinion

Hanks v. City of Port Arthur

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1932No. 5285PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chief Justice CURETOÑ

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case is before us by writ of error. The suit was brought by H. M. Hanks and wife, Jennie Hanks, against the City of Port Arthur, for personal injuries to the latter.

While walking on a cement sidewalk in a thickly settled portion of the City of Port Arthur, Mrs. Hanks stepped into a hole or depression in the sidewalk, fell, and suffered injuries. The condition which caused her to fall is set forth in the pleading as follows:

“That the hole or depression in said sidewalk was about twelve (12) inches wide, twenty-eight (28) inches…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. City of Galveston v. PosnainskyTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Parks v. WestTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Gainesville, Henrietta & Western Railway Co. v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. G., C. & S. F. R'y Co. v. FullerTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Sutton v. City of SnohomishWashington Supreme Court · 1895

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Moreno v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Sax v. VottelerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Nelson v. KrusenTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. LeCroy v. HanlonTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Yancy v. United Surgical Partners International, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2007

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API