Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Henderson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 28, 1923No. 2104PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyce, J.

We have carefully considered the various propositions presented by appellant, and, having reached the conclusion that no grounds for reversal are shown, dispose of these propositions by a general statement of our conclusions.

The petition, in our opinion, presented a good cause of action for aggravated assault (articles 1008 and 1022, Penal Code) and false imprisonment (Penal Code, art. 1039; 11 R. C. L. p. 793, § 5; 25 C. J. pp. 452-455). The allegations of detention of the plaintiff, at the point of a gun, until the arrival of officers, for whom defendant sent, certainly made a case of false…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gold v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  2. Hays v. CrearyTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. W. M. W. N.W. Ry. Co. v. GrangerTexas Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Zeiger v. WoodsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. Taylor Bros. v. HearnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adler v. Beverly Hills HospitalCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. JC Penney Company v. DuranCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. Gerald G. Reicheneder v. Skaggs Drug CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  4. Harrison v. Southland Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. Box v. FluittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API