Legal Opinion

Adler v. Beverly Hills Hospital

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 7, 1980No. 20117PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUITTARD, Chief Justice.

The principal question presented is whether a cause of action for false imprisonment accrues for the purpose of the statute of limitations when the unlawful detention begins or when it ends. We hold that false imprisonment is a continuing tort and that the cause of action for the entire period of imprisonment accrues when the detention ends. We also hold that if a person is unlawfully detained and turned over to a mental hospital, where he is confined and prevented from taking any legal action, his cause of action against the persons who first detained him is tolled…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. O'Connor v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Atkins v. CroslandTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Wolf v. PerrymanTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Collins v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Martin v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Ruiz v. Conoco, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Whm Custom Services, Inc., and Disa, Inc. v. Gilberto RinconesTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Texas Disposal Systems Landfill, Inc. v. Waste Management Holdings, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
  5. General Universal Systems, Inc. v. Hal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API