Taylor Bros. v. Hearn

JAMES, Chief Justice.

According to the charge in this case, it was submitted to the jury as one for malicious prosecution and false imprisonment on behalf of appellees against the members of the firm of Taylor Bros, and Ben F. Harless.

As we understand the amended petition,, it does not state a case of malicious prosecution, nor does it declare for damages arising from malicious prosecution. It alleged that Mrs. Hearn owed appellants for jewelry bought of them in Houston, and that on April 9, 1907, they moved from Houston to Memphis; that as they alighted from the train at Memphis they were…