United States v. Clatterbuck
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
CHESNUT, District Judge.
In the above case on the criminal docket, Harry and Rebecca Seidman have petitioned the court to relieve them from a bail forfeiture which was entered against them on September 21, 1936. The governing statute is United States Code, Title 18, § 601, 18 U.S.C.A. § 601, which reads as follows: “When any recognizance in a criminal cause, taken for, or in, or returnable to, any court of the United States, is forfeited by a breach of the condition thereof, such court may, in its discretion, remit the whole or a part of the penalty, whenever it appears to the court that there…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Taylor v. TaintorSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- United States v. NordenholzCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- United States v. TraynorDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1909
- United States v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1909
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Isgrig v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
- James Carlock Babb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- United State ex rel. Coy v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941
- United States v. BruceDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1943
- Marvin's Credit, Inc. v. KitchingDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.