Legal Opinion

United States v. Clatterbuck

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided February 15, 1939No. 18248PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHESNUT, District Judge.

In the above case on the criminal docket, Harry and Rebecca Seidman have petitioned the court to relieve them from a bail forfeiture which was entered against them on September 21, 1936. The governing statute is United States Code, Title 18, § 601, 18 U.S.C.A. § 601, which reads as follows: “When any recognizance in a criminal cause, taken for, or in, or returnable to, any court of the United States, is forfeited by a breach of the condition thereof, such court may, in its discretion, remit the whole or a part of the penalty, whenever it appears to the court that there…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaintorSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. United States v. NordenholzCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  3. United States v. TraynorDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1909
  4. United States v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1909
  5. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Isgrig v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
  2. James Carlock Babb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
  3. United State ex rel. Coy v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941
  4. United States v. BruceDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1943
  5. Marvin's Credit, Inc. v. KitchingDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API