Legal Opinion

United States v. Traynor

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided March 20, 1909No. 3,130PublishedCited by 20 opinions

•On Application of Sureties for Remission of Judgment on Recognizance.

1Opinion of the Court

SANFORD, District Judge.

1. I am of the opinion that under Rev. St. § 1020, re-enacting Act Feb. 28, 1839, c. 36, § 6, 5 Stat. 322 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 719), the court has authority in its discretion to remit the whole or any part of the penalty of a recognizance in a criminal case forfeited by breach of condition, even although the term has expired at which a final judgment was taken on the forfeited recognizance under a writ of scire facias. While it is true that, gen*115erally speaking, all filial judgments of a court pass beyond its control, unless steps be taken to set aside, modify, .or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bronson v. SchultenSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Brooks v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. United States v. BargerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1884

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Henry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1923
  3. United States v. KelleherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  4. United States v. American Bonding Co. of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
  5. Griffin v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1921

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API