United States v. Traynor
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
•On Application of Sureties for Remission of Judgment on Recognizance.
1Opinion of the Court
SANFORD, District Judge.
1. I am of the opinion that under Rev. St. § 1020, re-enacting Act Feb. 28, 1839, c. 36, § 6, 5 Stat. 322 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 719), the court has authority in its discretion to remit the whole or any part of the penalty of a recognizance in a criminal case forfeited by breach of condition, even although the term has expired at which a final judgment was taken on the forfeited recognizance under a writ of scire facias. While it is true that, gen*115erally speaking, all filial judgments of a court pass beyond its control, unless steps be taken to set aside, modify, .or…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bronson v. SchultenSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Brooks v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- United States v. BargerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1884
3Cited by20 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Henry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1923
- United States v. KelleherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- United States v. American Bonding Co. of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
- Griffin v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1921
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.