Legal Opinion
In Re Credit Card Payment Protection Plan Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided December 1, 2010No. MDL No. 2931PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING TRANSFER
DAVID R. HANSEN, Acting Chairman.
Before the Panel * : Plaintiffs in an action pending in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Esslinger) and an action pending in the District of New Jersey action (Rizera) have moved, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, to centralize this litigation in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. This litigation currently consists of these two actions and another action pending in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Tractenberg), as listed on Schedule A. 1
Responding defendants 2 oppose centralization. Citi alternatively requests that the Panel stay…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re Eli Lilly & Co.(cephalexin Monohydrate)United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978
- In Re Checking Account Overdraft LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2009
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Mortgage Lender Force-Placed Insurance LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
- In re Tropicana Orange Juice Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
- In Re Discover Card Payment Protection Plan Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011
- In re Bank of America Credit Protection Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011
- In re Refund Anticipation Loan LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012